presentation of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988
it's been a long time since Maverick (Top Gun) was fooling around in his F-14. Now an instructor-driver at Miramar, we can still see him hitting the red zone from his Kawa. But has he kept his GPZ or has he been seduced by the brand-new ZX-10 Tomcat?
that's the story we tell ourselves after watching the film. In reality, Maverick doesn't exist, but the ZX-10 does, and he would certainly have been happy to ride it when he stepped off his supersonic. Why Tomcat as a nickname? In reference to the American fighter jet, and surely because the film was a great advertisement for Kawasaki and its Ninja (Tom Cruise, a chick, a fighter jet, a motorcycle - what a poster!) This big sports bike is none other than the daughter of the 1000 RX and the descendant of the 900 Ninja. A profound evolution that makes it a muscular, respectable machine, a touch bourgeois and very attached to performance. Its design is wiser than that of the sultry Suzuki GSX-R 1100, with Kawa aiming for a wider customer base and more extensive capabilities.
the Tomcat takes few elements from the RX. Rather, almost everything has been changed or modified. Consider that between the two bikes, weight has dropped by 16 kilos. Engineers lost no less than 4 kilos on the engine. How did they achieve this? Thanks to a new cylinder head, lighter and more compact, a lightened vilo, revised moving parts, a valve train that loses grams, etc, etc.... Enough to write a book. Which brings us to number 12: the increased power of the boiler - it develops 137 bhp - and the reduced weight of the chassis and bodywork. The perimeter frame is relatively similar in design to that of the RX, but now uses aluminum. The manufacturer has long preferred steel, and this is a new stage in the development of its models. The eccentrically-adjustable swingarm is also made of aluminum. 
Svelte on paper, the Tomcat is no slimmer 600. Its shape is generous, its rear end wide, and its rear tire has a very nice cross-section (a 160 mm low-profile radial, for God's sake!). The bike has benefited from a great deal of attention, and is more attractive but less aggressive. This beautiful lady no longer has the viper-like quality of the 900 Ninja. The choice is yours...
Sporty to the core, the ZX-10 is also welcoming, teeming with little touches that you'll appreciate quickly or immediately. The frame's right-hand plate houses an ultra-simple, accessible knob for adjusting the rear shock absorber. It's the best we've ever done (and even after, not many models have done better). As on the RX, the passenger handlebar can be adjusted. However, the anti-dive function has disappeared, the front wheel has been increased to 17", the turn-signal reminder is a push-button function, and each control lever can be adjusted in distance... and there's also the retractable hooks inlaid in the rear shell, and a 4-piston caliper braking system with large discs, and pis too... Yeah, well, let's roll!

The machine doesn't just boast supersonic acceleration. It also puts the rider at ease when it comes to speed. Too much, in fact! With excellent protection, the bike allows you to cruise along at top speed without you even realizing it.
As long as you're riding on a wide expanse of asphalt, the suspension and rider have no trouble understanding each other. But to ensure roadholding qualities, the damping is designed to be firm. This is noticeable on bumpy roads, especially when attacking, but the stiffness remains within acceptable limits. Handy and easy to handle in standard and sporty conditions, the Tomcat becomes less pleasant in town. Nothing insurmountable, but in low-speed evolutions, average agility is not helped by the reduced turning radius. The bike still requires a bit of effort to thread its way through town, and to be taken along on mountain roads.

from the first Ninja, Kawasaki has refined, optimized and civilized its big sports bikes. With a more "samurai" spirit, the ZX-10 Tomcat appears as a skilful blend of performance, sporting elegance and road craft. It takes on the CBR 1000 for almost the same price. The nastiness has softened, but the optimization makes the Kawasaki Tomcat an excellent, fast tourer.
M.B - internet photos
Key facts Kawasaki ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT (1988) : What you need to know before you buy
Highlights
- Stabilité
- Performances
- Motor torque
Weak points
- Tiring position in town
- Comfort
Prices
| Basic version | |
|---|---|
|
8,270€
|
Performance
- Max speed : 268 km/h (166.50 mph)
- 0-100 km/h acceleration : 3.60 s
- Average fuel consumption : 8.50 liters/100km (0.28 mpg)
-
Estimated range
: 259 km (161 miles)
Calculated range until tank is empty, not verified.
Specifications Kawasaki ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988
- Chassis
- Frame : type E-box and alu
- Fuel capacity : 22 liters (5.81 US gallons)
- Seat height : 790 mm (31.10 in)
- Wheelbase : 1,490 mm (58.66 in)
- Dry weight : 222 kg (489 lb)
- Weight when fully loaded : 260 kg (573 lb)
- Front axle
- Telehydraulic fork Ø 41 mm, Wheel travel : 135 mm (5.31 in)
- Braking 2 discs Ø 300 mm (11.81 in), 2-piston caliper
- Front tire : 120 / 70 - 17 → Order this type of tire
- Transmission
- 6 stage gearbox
- Secondary by chain
- Rear axle
- Mono-damper, Wheel travel : 135 mm (5.31 in)
- Braking 1 disc Ø 250 mm (9.84 in), 2-piston caliper
- Rear tire : 160 / 60 - 18 → Order this type of tire
- Motor
- 4 cylinders online , 4 strokes
- 4 carburetors Ø 36 mm
- Cooling system : liquid
- 2 ACT
- 4 valves per cylinder
- 997 cc
- 137 ch (135.10 hp) to 10,000 rpm
- 10.50 mkg to 9,000 rpm
- Power-to-weight ratio : 1.64 kg/ch
- Weight / torque ratio : 21.14 kg/mkg
- Compression : 11 : 1
- Practical information
Used
Compare the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT to its competitors
Acceleration
Fuel consumption
Range
Torque
Power
Power-to-Weight ratio
Torque-to-Weight ratio
Speed
FAQ Your frequently asked questions about the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988
- What is the power of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988?
-
The ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988 develops a power of 137 ch (135.10 hp)
- What is the torque of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988?
-
The maximum torque of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988 is 10.50 mkg to 9,000 rpm.
- What is the maximum speed of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988?
-
The ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988 is capable of reaching a top speed of 268 km/h (166.50 mph) on the track.
- What is the weight of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988?
-
The ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988 has a a dry weight of 222 kg (489 lb), a weight when fully loaded of 260 kg (573 lb).
- What is the fuel consumption of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988?
-
Average fuel consumption is estimated at 8.50 l/100km (0.28 mpg) according to the WMTC cycle.
- QWhat is the seat height of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988?
-
To ensure good accessibility, the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988 offers a minimum seat height of 790 mm (31.10 in).
- What is the price of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988?
-
The price of the ZX-10 1000 TOMCAT 1988 is 8,270€ in France
News
-
New motorcycle products for 2026
-
Bridgestone announces the RS12, its new road-race weapon.
-
Yamaha Race Like A Girl: Natalia Rivera in episode 5.
-
Bridgestone presents the Battlax V03, its new slick tire.
-
With Sartoria Meccanica, MV-Agusta aims to go beyond premium.
-
Upgrading the entire Bonneville family for 2026.
-
Metzeler unveils three new tires at EICMA.
-
World Superbike celebrates 70 years of Yamaha.
-
Exceptional: some thirty new Triumphs in 2026.
-
40.000 bikers for the Royal-Enfield "One Ride" 2025.






Bikers' reviews Leave a review - 44 reviews
I had a braking problem, which was solved by adapting an ER6 caliper to it, as the original calipers were out of order
I saw this adaptation on the net and it works very well
Otherwise, I'm 1m69 tall and ride it without any problem, except that when the road slopes sideways, you have to be careful because the beast weighs a lot
It's a very pleasant bike to ride (yes, I say ride, because when you approach a trajectory it's not a bike like today's bikes, you have to concentrate a bit, even if it's recoverable if you're not too hard on it....)
As I've already said, it doesn't consume much fuel, so I won't dwell on that
the pleasure is there when you're on it and for me it's the main thing, I'd never part with it...rather cr..r lol Rating : 4/5 Respond to Kasawan
In June 1989, I bought a new Tomcat, the box and grey, for 58000f from Mak-Moto Quai de Bosc, in Sète. I must say that it was nothing but happiness during the 4 years I kept it, only to change it for an 1100ZZR. I never had it de-trimmed because I didn't see the point (not to mention the financial aspect of such an operation, I think around 15,000f if memory serves) and then motorcycles over 100hp were simply banned from January 1, 1986. Yes, because at that time, the maximum authorized power was 100hp, not 106hp, and the technical data is a bit distorted since, logically, you should have indicated that of the bridled version. I can understand why some people wanted to restore the car to its original power, if only for the sake of its top speed, but as I said, 100 hp was quite sufficient. It allowed me to reach a v-max of 260 revs at 10,000 rpm with the red zone at 11,000, which at the time wasn't ridiculous. I think this must have corresponded, give or take a few crumbs, to the 241km/h measured by Moto-Journal. Some might retort that if I'd had a free version, I'd have had the last 1000 laps available. That's not untrue, and even completely true, but between you and me, 260 isn't nice enough as it is? And the omnipresent torque always surprised me; I never needed to drop even a single gear to restart the machine. All I had to do was open the throttle, period. Not to mention that it picked up better at low revs than an overclocked version. Provided it was in the same gear, of course.
In 6th gear, below 3000rpm (90hp on the odometer), there wasn't much going on, I must admit, but beyond that speed, as soon as the throttle was opened, you could hear a dull rumbling coming from deep within the bowels of its fabulous engine, a sign that the bulk of the cavalry was about to arrive. And the 100hp gave me much lower fuel consumption than a 137hp version. By driving very calmly, like gentle acceleration, navigating between 90 and 130 (I admit I had to resist! ðŸ˜") and using the torque as often as possible, I more than once went into reserve (3 liters) after 390kms. So much distance on just 19 liters of fuel, giving an average of 4 litres/100. Not bad, I think. Compare it to the 4.1/100 measured by Moto-Journal. High and very high revs are a different story. During my last spring spent in its company, on a Wednesday, I set off calmly to Toulouse (I'm from Sète) and along the main road. É Obviously, I had more than enough with the full tank, without touching the reserve, I mean. On the way back, I fill up at the last station before reaching the freeway. Once off the slip road, I decided to use up all the gas I had available. By the time I reached Balaruc, I had 200km to cover (plus a dozen more before arriving in my good little town). These 200 km were covered in 1 hour. I navigated between 220 and 260 meters. This gives an hourly average of 200km/h. As for fuel consumption, I passed the reserve just as I reached the exit ramp. That gives us 9.5/100. Not bad either, I think. Between you and me, friends, I wonder what I would have gained with a 137hp Tomcat. 268 lap times instead of 241? Yes, but I don't regret it. Fuel consumption would have been higher, and tires would have worn out faster too. The article says that the Tomcat is a sports car. I don't quite agree, to say the least. It has the look of a sports bike, but for me it's first and foremost a big GT with a few inclinations to pick up the pace if the mood struck, but not really sporty in the stict sense of the word. Quite simply because it's too heavy to qualify, even if it is lighter than a 900 Bol d'Or by around 10kg. You know as well as I do that it's not power that determines cornering speed. I've done Sète-Albi v.v. dozens of times. If you know the route, once you've passed the Biterrois, there's the Montagne Noire, about 10 kilometers of more or less tight bends interspersed with short straights, not forgetting the inevitable hairpins. Well, I remember perfectly that 8 years ago, I was going faster in some places with my good old CX500 and its 50hp. That's 50 less than my ex-Tomcat. I sincerely believe that the Tomcat's primary vocation is long-distance driving on main roads and freeways, nothing more. In January 1993, before leaving for Brittany, I had 2 very small modifications made to it. Heated grips (plus sleeves) and an Ermax bubble instead of the original low bubble. The 850 kilometers went by without the slightest hitch, arriving at the end of the route in fairly satisfactory overall shape, and were it not for the inevitable stops for petrol, hot chocolate and cigarette breaks, I was perfectly capable of doing the whole route in one go. I wouldn't be so bold as to compare the comfort of the Tomcat with that of a Goldwing, but it's not far off being Pullman. In any case, it's at least as good as on board a CX500, which was already considered one of the benchmarks in its field ten years earlier. I have nothing but praise for this bike. The only point that bothered me, but it's really just a quibble, was its somewhat uncertain behavior in town when turning a corner, or the sequences taken a little quickly, compared to that of a 1000cbr of the same era, which seemed more neutral and safer. Perhaps because of its lower center of gravity, I don't really know. As for the 1000cbr, having ridden it more than once, I realized that this bike was perfect, too perfect for me, because I like bikes that make you feel they're there and that they've got character... like the Tomcat! The 1000cbr wasn't like that, performance-wise. I could see the needle on the rev counter climbing, but without the slightest sensation. In any case, Kawasakis of equivalent displacement have always been more generous than Hondas. Take, for example, a 750 L4 with its 8-valve cylinder head from the early '80s. Well, this moped, with equivalent power, accelerated harder, was more torquey and consumed less fuel than a CB750FA (the 900 Bol d'Or's twin sister) even though it was fitted with a 16-valve DOHC.
In short, if we leave aside my 125Twin for the emotional side of beginnings (you know, the moment when you leave your good old moped behind and think you're an ace on the road because you've got the astronomical power of 16.5hp! ðŸ˜") of all the bikes I've owned, if I had to choose just one, I'd take the Tomcat without the slightest hesitation, because it's the one I regret the most, even compared with my last ZX12R.
Kawasaki forever!
PS: In my Facebook album, I have a few photos of my ex-Tomcat and ZX12R. If you're passing by, after having imposed on you the ordeal of a very long comment (I apologize, eh? 😉) and if you're interested, I can send you what I find.
Here's my e-mail address; don't hesitate...
Éric in Sète. 😊
magicsenna34@gmail.com
Rating : 5/5 Respond to magicsenna34
Thanks for your advice. Rating : 5/5 Respond to ABS
is there a difference between these two tomcat models for parts?
thanks in advance
cordially steph
Rating : 5/5 Respond to steph
when you love it, you don't count!
i restore them and ride them regularly for my own pleasure ... Rating : 5/5 Respond to zebulon60
I too have a 1990 zx10, a tomcat, which I "rediscovered" in my garage last June. Unfortunately, the engine doesn't run. Yet it was running without a hitch, and had clocked up around 30,000 kms. I remembered that I'd removed the spark plugs 3\4 years ago without putting them back in, so this could be the cause of the engine stalling. What do you think?
Thanks and see you soon. Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation
you'll love it. It pushes hard, and consumes 6.5 litres of SP98
Rating : 5/5 Respond to gigi
for your information, there's a great forum specializing in tomcats (of which I'm a member, of course ^^)
here's the address if you'd like to join us.
http://1000tomcat.forumactif.org/
@
Rating : 5/5 Respond to l\'aspirider
I own this motorcycle, the same as the one at the bottom of the page on the right, and I'm very happy with it, except that I'm looking for the front indicators and it's hard not to find them, I must say that it's already 24 years old but only 65,000km.
Sincerely !!! cèdric ! Rating : 5/5 Respond to cèdric
I have blinkers in any case one and a complete a la piece...
Sincerely ju Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation
175,000 km without servicing???
Sincerely Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation
bought cheap at 900? with 81000km, I changed some parts like chain and alternator tensioner, clutch, brake, it has today 89 000 km and frankly I love it
it's got torque, and it doesn't let up on the road
the problem is finding parts at kawa given its age Rating : 5/5 Respond to airic
I ate several modern motorcycles and even luxury sports cars! Anyway, it's a Kawa, it's green and white, I've completely overhauled it, the best four-cylinder ever! Greetings to all 80's Kawasaki lovers. Rating : 5/5 Respond to nono71
Some photos on
http://copainsdavant.linternaute.com/cgi/album_photo/album_photo_visualisation.php?f_id_album=974662&f_cle_album=1627485746
or here
http://dumont.thierryjp.free.fr/tomcat/bonetat/bonetat.html
Bonne route en tomcat. Rating : 5/5 Respond to thierry
1000 Kawasaki Tomcat: crack is less addictive
Angus (Albens, Savoie, France) Rating : 5/5 Respond to Angus
i'm telling you the truth, after having already had more than 20 kawas in 22 years of driving, I'm going to marry this little ZX10....hoping that the divorce, if there ever is one, won't be too painful...... Rating : 5/5 Respond to MANU18
18 YEARS. I'VE HAD MANY OTHER BIKES SINCE THEN, BUT THIS IS THE ONLY ONE I'VE NEVER HAD ENOUGH OF
I STILL LIKE THE LOOK AND THE ENGINE
AS SOON AS I GET ON IT, I ALWAYS GET A THRILL
THIS BIKE WILL ALWAYS BE MINE
Rating : 5/5 Respond to LE BOSS
This legendary bike has nothing to envy of modern machines, at least when you're over 1.8m tall
A + Rating : 5/5 Respond to phiphi
I'm happy to be riding this grandmother, and I'm having a blast !!!! Rating : 5/5 Respond to Phil
je l'aime Rating : 5/5 Respond to gromu
i heard there's the Harley myth?
well, for me it's the tomcat myth!
to see that there are still muscular, which pushes on the handlebars of the tomcat, for my part, I have two of them, one of 1989 since 1990 in open versions with 86000 km, and one of 1988 since 9 years, the 88 of origin, to go in Switzerland, to work every day, even with -10 recently, frankly, super machine, short wheelbase, very good protection, comfort at the rear, all the way to Brittany, from Alsace, for the moment, I can't find an equivalent, in idea, to what kawa had done, today, it goes from rocket! as for the 89, it's my darling! camshaft, KN air filter, devil endurance 3 ,4 in 1! direct output with absorbtion and not 4 in 2 and in 1 what it had at Le Mans, beringer disc, aviation hoses, and ceramic brake pads!
here we can talk about F14, frankly when I go from the original to this one it's fury, the rev counter goes straight up to 11000TR/mn at 11.5 revs, even though it's designed to run at 13000! well yeah, not to mention the music that this devil generates on this machine, a bit like a tenor, with a roque voice!for me, it's a short, powerful, imposing, puncture-proof, helpful "fucking machine", with an empty front pocket (disc clamp), and an empty rear pocket for a net, tools and a puncture kit, perfect! on the ZZR, they've done away with all that! come on! those who've kept it there, 136 bhp original, + the devil 11 bhp and the kn, we can talk about 150 bhp in 1990! i've pushed a few of them in Germany, in BMWs and Porsches, but be careful, today's big diesels push very hard too, I got "pushed" on the freeway (while I was giving it some fresh air) by a Swiss, 10 seconds at 250 (max 280mph), and it stuck me, to finish? BMW 5.30D, new version I think also open, surprising no? a diesel, has your ass at almost 260!.so? what's the police doing! HI! Rating : 5/5 Respond to jnrs12zx10
motorcycle built for long trips, in the mountains requires muscle, otherwise the best and my kids love it Rating : 5/5 Respond to bruno
youngsters, please refrain!
weight can be managed quite easily, but you still need
you need to be the right size for it
when it comes to power (which seems to be limitless at full power), it's a question of wisdom, as speed is barely noticeable. Rating : 5/5 Respond to dam
you could say it's a bike of legends, although difficult to handle at low speed, it's a delight to ride normally or even sporty
it's true that with the original seat it's a bit hard but once modified it's like any modern motorcycle and the acceleration is powerful Rating : 5/5 Respond to topgun