Comparison Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 vs Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 - With just over 6,000 euros, two or four legs?

With just over 6000 euro, two or Four legs? By Oli the Belgian Photos: Speedy First view: The white XJ6 versus the black Gladius; and although the lines are very similar, the look remains a matter of taste. Following the opinions and comments of several Internet users, I have to say that my view has changed somewhat... Both bikes share a discreet plasticity, but it's true that the Suzuki Gladius's styling may have something feminine about it, or rather something not "biker" enough? Very incisive, the little radiator covers on the Yamaha XJ6 are very nice and rather aggressive. A plus for the Suzuki thanks to its headlight, which is reminiscent of the MV Agusta Brutale style. In both cases, the manufacturers have chosen the pot option underneath the bike. A good thing too, since under-seat pots certainly have a sportier feel, but they represent a lot of unsprung weight, and on many motorcycles, it's a real pain in the butt! Despite this, the two mufflers aren't on the same level: the Yamaha XJ6's low output heats up the right boot at idle, a problem I'd already encountered on the "late" Buell, while the Suzuki Gladius has an ugly muffler: the kind of muffler that forces you to budget for an "adaptable output" when you buy it. Mind you, I had the same thought when I saw the cartridge of the new Yamaha FZ8. Very similar seat height, yet the position is not the same! The Suzuki Gladius saddle is considerably firmer, and the under-seat covers shear the thighs (well, okay, I've got big thighs!) <img src="http://www.motoplanete.com/comparo/Gladius-vs-XJ6-1.jpg" alt="" width="520" height="347"> The Yamaha XJ6's handlebars are quite closed and "droopy", so the riding position is "sportier", in all the wrong senses of the word.<In this respect, the wider, flatter handlebars of the Suzuki Gladius offer a less tiring position and (can we call this a positive point?) force you to ride at a reasonable speed or forget the freeway. The wind resistance is such that from 150 (with a slender rider like me, 1.82m, 95kg, winter jacket) the bike starts to sway. The dashboards reveal a search for economy, the one on the Yamaha XJ6 is none other than the Yamaha FZ series model, no big worries for the look, everything is there but it lacks a little warmth. For the Suzuki Gladius, we find the very practical engaged gear indicator, an option we'd like to find on the Yamaha XJ6, so fast does the engine rev and encourage you to pass 7th. It's already running at 7,000rpm at 130 km/h, which puts the needle in the second half of the rev counter. Motor!" Between the manly hammering of the Suzuki Gladius (not unlike the mill of the KTM SuperDuke, yes, yes) and the blaring of the Yamaha XJ6, the tone is set. <img src="http://www.motoplanete.com/comparo/Gladius-vs-XJ6-2.jpg" alt="" width="520" height="317"> This is the point that interested me most in this comparison. I've always had my doubts about putting a four-legged on a 600. Well, ok, I ride a twin (Yamaha TDM 900) and I have to say I love the way this type of engine behaves for everyday riding, but then, only stupid people don't change their minds. I'm cutting off all suspense, I haven't changed my mind! Of course, a little throttle when downshifting is a lot more fun with a 4-wheeler, the extension is different, but the red zone at 11500 only allows two riding styles on the Yamaha XJ6. Either you shift into sixth as fast as you can and ride on the torque. But in this case, it's not uncommon to have to "drop" 1, 2, even 3 gears to regain a bit of vigor for a virile overtaking. Or, grand prix-style driving, always up in the revs! During a duo outing, I tested both driving styles. The 6th on the rolling road and the top of the rev counter for the twisty....... As the in-line 4 doesn't have a very present engine brake, driving at the top isn't too uncomfortable for the passenger. I have to say that even during an attack, er, lively and in duet, the bike doesn't come apart. The Suspension does a very good job (well, it's stiff anyway, eh!) and the bike is really fun in the twisty. What about the Gladius? I tested it solo, on a similar course to the Yamaha XJ6. There's no mistaking it: at the same speed and on the same road, the Suzuki's twin-cylinder is a delight. Quite simply, you're always in the right rev range. <A real mini KTM SuperDuke, I tell you! On the other hand, the suspension and handling are less bleeding edge than on the Yamaha XJ6. The bike tends to come apart when you go hard into corners, and the cornering isn't as straightforward... It holds together just about .....quand même, one isn't a precision monster and the other a custom, but it's true that if you go from one to the other the difference in behavior is obvious Add to that, an ultra lively gearbox with perfect locking and it's bliss! <img src="http://www.motoplanete.com/comparo/Gladius-vs-XJ6-3.jpg" alt="" width="520" height="347"> Conclusions: Here, for once, I almost feel like saying that the top would be the mix of the two... The chassis from the YamahaXJ6 and the engine from the Suzuki Gladius. Obviously that's impossible, so... which one to choose? As is often the case when buying a motorcycle, it's important to think about the primary use of the future 2-wheeler. In this case, price, fuel consumption (less than 6 liters in all cases) and rideability are very similar. Then there's the look... And now I've fallen in love with the Yam! A pre-test crush that has been largely overshadowed by the Gladius's motoring pleasure! I'm not helping you here, so much the worse, it's up to you ;-) A+ Oli the Belgian

Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010

Chassis

Nombre de places

Frame

En acier de type Diamant Treillis tubulaire en acier

Fuel capacity

17.30 liters (4.57 US gallons) 14.50 liters (3.83 US gallons)

Oil capacity

Seat height

Seat height : 785 mm (30.91 in) Seat height : 785 mm (30.91 in)

Length

Length : 2,120 mm (83.46 in) Length : 2,130 mm (83.86 in)

Width

770 mm (30.31 in)

Height

Min height : 1,085 mm (42.72 in) Min height : 1,090 mm (42.91 in)

Ground clearance

Wheelbase

1,440 mm (56.69 in) 1,445 mm (56.89 in)

Dry weight

Curb mass

Weight when fully loaded

205 kg 202 kg

Brake assist

ABS optional ABS optional

Front axle

Suspension

Telehydraulic fork Ø 41 mm Telehydraulic fork Ø 41 mm

Wheel travel

130 mm (5.12 in) 130 mm (5.12 in)

Angle de chasse

Setting

Brake

Braking 2 discs Ø 298 mm (11.73 in), 2-piston caliper Braking 2 discs Ø 290 mm (11.42 in), 2-piston caliper

Wheel

Front tire : 120 / 70 - 17 Front tire : 120 / 70 - 17

Pressure

2.25 bar 2.25 bar

Handlebars

Transmission

Gearbox

6 stage gearbox 6 stage gearbox , manual

Transmission

Secondary by chain Secondary by chain

Rear axle

Suspension

Mono-damper Mono-damper

Wheel travel

130 mm (5.12 in) 130 mm (5.12 in)

Setting

Brake

Braking 1 disc Ø 245 mm (9.65 in), single-piston caliper Braking 1 disc Ø 220 mm (8.66 in), single-piston caliper

Wheel

Rear tire : 160 / 60 - 17 Rear tire : 160 / 60 - 17

Pressure

2.5 bar 2.5 bar

Motor

Motor type

4 cylinders online , 4 strokes two-cylinder 90° L-shape , 4 strokes

Cooling system

liquid liquid

Fuel system

Injection Injection Ø 39 mm

Fuel

Starting system

Timing

2 ACT 2 ACT

Number of valves

4 valves per cylinder 4 valves per cylinder

Displacement

600 cc, Bore x stroke: 65.5 x 44.5 mm 645 cc, Bore x stroke: 81 x 62.6 mm

Power

76.9 ch to 10,000 rpm 71 ch to 8,400 rpm

With compressed air

- -

Compression

12.2 : 1 11.5 : 1

Torque

6.10 mkg to 8,500 rpm 6.40 mkg to 6,400 rpm

With compressed air

- -

Émission sonore

- -

Motorcycle can be restricted to 34ch (A MTT1 Permit)

No No

Motorcycle can be restricted to 48ch (French A2 Permit)

No No

Options/Equipment

Standard equipment

Brake assist : ABS optional

Standard equipment

Brake assist : ABS optional

Practical information

The advantages

Easy and accessible

Look sympa

Ideal for beginners

Tarif contenu

The sparkling twin

General style

Recipe

The disadvantages

Standard equipment

Limited sports use

Bras oscillant simple

Exhaust... to be appreciated

Soft equipment

Performance

Max speed : approximately 190 km/h (118.10 mph)

Max speed : approximately 200 km/h (124.30 mph)

Average fuel consumption : 5 liters/100km (0.47 mpg)

Estimated range : 290 km (180 miles)

Price

Basic version with ABS

France
5,999€

6,899€

Basic version

France
6,299€

Country of manufacture

Compare

Fuel consumption

Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 Undisclosed

Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 : 5 liters/100km (0.47 mpg)

Range

Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 Undisclosed

Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 : 290 km (180 miles)

Torque

Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 : 6.1 mkg

Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 : 6.4 mkg

Power

Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 : 78 ch (76.90 hp)

Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 : 72 ch (71 hp)

Power-to-Weight ratio

Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 : 2.47 kg/ch *

Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 : 2.66 kg/ch *

Torque-to-Weight ratio

Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 : 31.14 kg/mkg *

Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 : 29.54 kg/mkg *

Speed

Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 : approximately 190 km/h (118.10 mph)

Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 : approximately 200 km/h (124.30 mph)

Models

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Competitors

Honda CBF 600 N 2010 Kawasaki ER-6n 650 2010 Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010

Harley-Davidson XL 883 SPORTSTER IRON 2010 Honda CB 600 F HORNET 2010 Triumph 675 STREET TRIPLE 2010 Kawasaki ER-6n 650 2010 Ducati 696 MONSTER 2010 KTM 690 DUKE R 2010 BMW F 800 R 2010

Bikers' reviews

Leave your review about Comparison Yamaha XJ6 600 Naked 2010 vs Suzuki SFV 650 GLADIUS 2010 - With just over 6,000 euros, two or four legs?

Evaluate this motorcycle :

Be contacted if there's a response

By checking this box, you accept the terms of our GDPR policy.

Save some time by using your account